Hardcoat Anodizing: Complete Type III Guide

Hardcoat anodizing (Type III) is an electrochemical process that grows a thick, dense aluminum oxide layer, 25 to 150 µm, on aluminum using chilled sulfuric acid and high current density. It reaches 60 to 70 HRC equivalent (Mohs 9) for extreme wear resistance. It costs 2 to 4 times more than standard Type II anodizing, […]

18 min read
Hardcoat Anodizing: Complete Type III Guide

Hardcoat anodizing (Type III) is an electrochemical process that grows a thick, dense aluminum oxide layer, 25 to 150 µm, on aluminum using chilled sulfuric acid and high current density. It reaches 60 to 70 HRC equivalent (Mohs 9) for extreme wear resistance. It costs 2 to 4 times more than standard Type II anodizing, and it grows roughly 50% inward and 50% outward, so machining must compensate for the dimensional change.

Think about what happens inside a pneumatic cylinder that cycles thousands of times a day. The valve spool slides against its bore, aluminum surfaces grinding against each other with no lubricant. Bare aluminum would wear through in weeks. Hardcoat anodizing is the surface that lets that part survive for years, and because it grows from the aluminum itself, it can’t peel, chip, or flake off like a plated coating.

Here’s the problem we see every week: engineers spec “hard anodize” on a drawing without understanding the process parameters, dimensional growth, alloy limits, and cost structure that decide success or failure. Get the tolerance wrong and parts come back oversized and scrap. Pick the wrong alloy and the coating burns.

By the end of this guide, you’ll know exactly what hardcoat anodizing is, when it’s worth the premium, how to specify it, and how to machine for it. This guide reflects real finishing experience from our in-house anodizing line and thousands of CNC-machined aluminum parts.

Key Takeaways

  • Hardcoat anodizing (Type III) produces the thickest, hardest anodized coating: 25-150 µm at 60-70 HRC / Mohs 9, roughly 10x the wear resistance of Type II and comparable to hardened tool steel.
  • The process runs in a chilled sulfuric acid bath (0-5°C) at 20-37 A/ft² with voltage rising to 60-100 V. It costs 2-4x Type II and adds 5-7 business days of lead time.
  • Coating grows ~50% inward and 50% outward. A 0.002″ coating adds ~0.001″ per side, so machine oversize and specify “dimensions after anodize.”
  • 6061 anodizes best; 2024 risks burning; 7075 works but can look uneven. Alloy choice drives cost, hardness, and uniformity.
  • Hardcoat has real limits: thermal crazing above ~80°C, fatigue reduction up to ~50%, dark colors only, and brittleness beyond ~0.003″.
  • PTFE-impregnated hardcoat (MIL-A-63576 / AMS 2482) cuts friction to 0.05-0.12 for sliding and wear applications.

What Is Hardcoat Anodizing?

What Is Hardcoat Anodizing?
What Is Hardcoat Anodizing?

Hardcoat anodizing (Type III) is an electrochemical process that converts the surface of aluminum into a thick, dense aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃) layer, 25 to 150 µm, using a chilled sulfuric acid electrolyte and high current density. The coating grows from the aluminum itself, so it can’t peel or chip, and it’s hard enough to resist wear like hardened steel.

You’ll hear this process called several names, and they all mean the same thing: “hard anodizing,” “hard coat anodizing,” “engineered anodizing,” and “type 3 anodizing” are all the same process, MIL-A-8625 Type III. The keyword that matters is Type III, which distinguishes it from the thinner Type I (chromic) and Type II (standard sulfuric) coatings.

The coating isn’t painted on or deposited. Anodizing converts the aluminum surface into oxide. That’s what makes hardcoat so durable: there’s no bond line to fail, no interface where a coating can delaminate. The oxide layer becomes part of the part.

Our complete guide to types of anodizing covers the full family, but this article goes deep on Type III specifically.

How Hardcoat Anodizing Works: The Process

Anodizing is an electrolytic process. The aluminum part is the anode (positive electrode), immersed in a sulfuric acid electrolyte, with DC current flowing through the bath. Oxygen generated at the surface reacts with aluminum to form aluminum oxide. The oxide layer grows into the part as the aluminum is consumed.

Hardcoat differs from standard Type II in four ways that matter: colder bath, higher current density, higher voltage, and longer time. Each change produces a denser, thicker, harder oxide.

Parameter Type II (standard) Type III (hardcoat)
Electrolyte Sulfuric acid 15-20% Sulfuric acid 165-250 g/L (15-25%)
Bath temperature 18-22°C 0-5°C (refrigerated, ±3°F control)
Current density 12-24 A/ft² 20-37 A/ft²
Voltage 12-20 V 20-25 V rising to 60-100 V
Time 15-45 min 45-120 min
Coating thickness 5-25 µm 25-150 µm
Coating density Porous Dense, low porosity

Why cold and high current? The chilled bath suppresses the chemical dissolution of the oxide as it forms. Sulfuric acid continuously attacks aluminum oxide; at 0-5°C, that attack slows dramatically, letting a dense, thick layer build. At higher current density, more oxygen drives oxide growth per minute.

The result is a coating with dramatically lower porosity than Type II. That’s exactly why it’s so much harder and more wear resistant.

Real production hardcoat lines use more than the textbook recipe. Process variants like Martin Hard Coat (MHC), Alcoa Alumilite 225/226 (mixed acid systems), Sanford low-voltage processes, pulsed rectifiers, and additive systems all fine-tune the chemistry for specific alloys and thickness targets. This is one reason hardcoat is best treated as a specialized capability rather than an add-on to a decorative anodizing line.

Hardness & Wear Resistance: Just How Hard Is It?

The headline number is Mohs 9. That puts hardcoat anodizing on the same hardness step as corundum, one step below diamond. Bare aluminum sits at Mohs 2.5; a steel nail scratches glass at about 6.5. Hardcoat is dramatically harder than the aluminum underneath it, which is the entire point.

In engineering terms, hardcoat on 6061-T6 typically measures 350-600 HV (Vickers hardness), with a commonly cited equivalent of 60-70 HRC (Rockwell C). The ISO 10074 standard sets minimums by alloy class: Class 1 (6xxx alloys) at least 400 HV, Class 2a (2xxx) at least 250 HV, Class 2b (5xxx/7xxx) at least 300 HV, and Class 3a castings at least 250 HV.

One honest caveat: HRC is an approximation for thin coatings. A Vickers microhardness reading per ISO 10074 is the measurable, specifiable value. Anoplate’s hardcoat hardness guide explains the same data from a coating house perspective.

Wear resistance tells the real story. On the Taber abrasion test, hardcoat on 6061-T6 scores about 0.15-0.35 mg per 1000 cycles. Type II anodizing scores 2.0-4.0. Electroless nickel scores 3-12.

That’s roughly 10 times better than Type II and up to 500 times better than bare aluminum. In practical terms, a hardcoated surface resists the sliding, abrasive wear that destroys anodized or plated finishes.

Two more properties round out the picture. Sealed hardcoat survives 336 to 1,000+ hours of salt spray (ASTM B117), making it a corrosion barrier as well as a wear barrier. And the oxide is an electrical insulator with a dielectric strength around 600-800 volts per mil, so hardcoated parts can withstand 1,000 to 2,000+ volts DC without breakdown.

Hardcoat also has honest limits. Above roughly 80°C of sustained service, the coating can micro-crack, a condition called thermal crazing. And the process can reduce high-cycle fatigue strength by up to about 50% on some alloys, a thermal residual stress from the difference in expansion between the oxide and the aluminum underneath. That’s why hardcoat is rarely specified on fatigue-critical structures like cyclically loaded shafts. Bal Seal’s technical report on hard anodizing covers both effects in engineering detail.

Hard Anodizing Thickness by Alloy

Coating thickness depends heavily on alloy. The table below shows typical hard anodizing thickness ranges by alloy, along with expected hardness and appearance. This is the kind of alloy-level guidance thin competitor guides skip.

Alloy Typical Thickness Hardness (HV) Appearance Notes
6061 25-75 µm (0.001-0.003″) 400-600 Near-black Best consistency; default spec
7075 25-60 µm (0.001-0.0024″) 450-550 Blue-gray to yellowish Good, but uneven cosmetic color
2024 25-50 µm (0.001-0.002″) 350-450 (min 250) Green/gray Burning risk; needs special programs
5052/5083 25-60 µm 400-500 (min 300) Dark gray Marine; good corrosion
Cast (A380) Limited Lower, variable Inconsistent High silicon problematic

6061 is the workhorse for hardcoat. It anodizes evenly, reaches the highest hardness, and produces the darkest, most consistent color. It’s why most hardcoated parts are 6061, and why 6061 aluminum machining pairs so naturally with a hardcoat finish.

2024 deserves special caution. Its copper content creates local heating during anodizing, which can cause “burning”: rough, powdery, discolored areas. Coating 2024 at Type III thickness requires higher acid concentration, proprietary systems, and a slower current ramp. It’s doable, but it’s not a standard program.

7075 hard anodizes well mechanically, but the color comes out uneven, often blue-gray or yellowish, because of its zinc and magnesium content. It’s a functional coating, not a cosmetic one. Expect 7075 to cost 25-40% more than 6061 to hard anodize.

Proper desmutting before the tank is essential for both 7075 and 2024. For high-strength aerospace parts, 7075 aluminum machining plus a tuned hardcoat program is a common and reliable combination.

A design note from the shop floor: when a customer asked us to hard anodize a 7075 landing-gear component, we tuned the coating thickness target rather than applying maximum thickness everywhere. The result was uniform hardness without the burning and unevenness that comes from pushing 7075 to its limits. The lesson: alloy choice often matters more than the finish choice, and they should be designed together.

Hard Anodizing vs Regular Anodizing (Type II)

Property Type II Type III (hardcoat)
Thickness 5-25 µm 25-150 µm
Hardness ~300 HV, Mohs ~5-6 350-600 HV, Mohs 9
Taber wear 2.0-4.0 mg/1000 cycles 0.15-0.35 mg/1000 cycles
Color options Any (dyes, bright) Dark only (black, gray, bronze)
Dimensional growth Small Significant (must be designed for)
Corrosion (sealed) Good Excellent (336-1,000+ hrs salt spray)
Cost Baseline 2-4x Type II
Best for Cosmetic, color, corrosion Wear, sliding, abrasion, insulation

Here’s the decision framework. If your part slides, rotates, or abrades against something, or if it lives in a dusty, gritty environment, choose Type III hardcoat. If you need a specific color, a bright appearance, or simple corrosion protection, Type II is likely the right, cheaper call. Hardcoat is overkill for decorative parts, and the premium gets hard to justify when the coating is purely cosmetic.

Dimensional Changes: Machining for Hardcoat

Dimensional Changes: Machining for Hardcoat
Dimensional Changes: Machining for Hardcoat

This is the section that saves people from scrapping parts, and it’s where a full-service shop that machines and anodizes has an unfair advantage. Hardcoat grows approximately 50% inward and 50% outward. The oxide consumes base aluminum while it builds above the original surface.

Here’s what that means in machining terms. For a 0.002″ (50 µm) coating, each surface grows outward about 0.001″. Across a diameter, the effect doubles: a bore shrinks by roughly 0.002″ in diameter, and an OD grows by roughly 0.002″. Threads are especially vulnerable and can lose one to two thread classes to the buildup.

Worked example: A shaft must finish at 0.5000″ OD after a 0.002″ Type III hardcoat. Machine it to 0.4980″ before anodizing, and it will come out at 0.5000″. Fail to plan for growth, machine at final size, and you get an out-of-tolerance part that’s scrap.

The same logic applies to bores, press fits, and sealing faces. Options are to mask these surfaces, or to machine them after anodizing by lapping, honing, or grinding. Post-size machining removes the coating on that surface, which matters for fits.

When a drawing says “dimensions after anodize,” everyone in the chain knows which numbers are final. Typical post-anodize tolerances run ±0.002-0.005″ unless surfaces are masked or post-sized.

Edge design matters too. Add a 0.010″ radius on external edges and 0.030″ in inside corners for Type III. Knife edges and thin fins concentrate current and burn. Blind holes should include drain holes so electrolyte can’t get trapped and attack the part after the tank.

Here’s a failure we saw play out: a 7075 suspension collar with internal threads came back from a coating house seized up. The hardcoat buildup on the threads reduced the pitch diameter, and the matching bolt no longer fit. The fix was simple: mask the threads or re-tap after anodizing, and define the thread strategy on the print. Thirty minutes of planning before machining would have saved an entire batch.

For tolerance-critical work, precision CNC machining combined with pre-compensated hardcoat dimensions is a proven workflow. Our engineers review dimensional growth on every quote where a finish affects final size.

PTFE-Impregnated Hardcoat: Hard Anodizing With Built-in Lubricity

Hardcoat is hard, but it’s not slick. If you need both wear resistance and low friction, PTFE-impregnated hardcoat, also called PTFE hardcoat anodizing, is the answer. This is hardcoat anodizing combined with PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) sealing, specified under MIL-A-63576 and AMS 2482 / AMS 2488.

The PTFE treatment drops the coefficient of friction to about 0.05-0.12, compared to roughly 0.3+ for unsealed hardcoat. That’s about 50% lower friction than hard anodizing alone, and it holds up under sliding contact. Applications that live on this property: pneumatic cylinder valve spools, hydraulic valve bodies, molds and dies that need release, firearm components, semiconductor and plasma-etching equipment, and pump parts that run without wet lubrication. Anoplate’s AnoLube III page documents one commercial PTFE-hardcoat system and its properties.

One honest caveat: the word “impregnation” is debated in the industry. PTFE particles are often larger than the oxide pores, so some argue the process fills surface asperities and bonds to the surface rather than penetrating deep into the coating. It works, but field testing is the real proof for friction and wear in your specific application. Treat it as a proprietary, verified process rather than a simple penetration step.

A pneumatic valve spool we hard-coated with PTFE impregnation is a good example. It runs without wet lubrication in a dry-air cylinder, cycles millions of times, and holds a consistent low-friction seal. On paper it’s a sliding-wear nightmare; in practice the PTFE-hardcoat combination made it a non-issue.

Black Hardcoat Anodizing

Black hardcoat is Type III anodizing dyed black, specified on a drawing like this: “ANODIZE PER MIL-A-8625 TYPE III, CLASS 2, BLACK.” Class 1 is undyed hardcoat; Class 2 is dyed.

There’s a meaningful difference between Type II black and Type III black. Type II black is for appearance. Type III black adds genuine wear resistance plus low optical reflectivity, which is why it shows up on camera bodies, optical mounts, weapon components, and sensor housings.

The trade-off: color depth depends on the alloy. 6061 takes a deep, near-black finish. 7075 comes out blue-gray, closer to charcoal than true black.

Applications: Where Hardcoat Anodizing Earns Its Keep

Hardcoat anodizing isn’t a decorative finish. It earns its cost in applications where wear, corrosion, and insulation matter more than appearance.

Aerospace

Landing gear components, hydraulic actuators, and structural parts run in abrasive, high-cycle environments. Hardcoat’s wear resistance and AS9100-compatible documentation make it standard. We hold AS9100 certification and machine and finish aerospace CNC machining parts daily.

Automotive

Pistons, cylinder liners, brake components, transmission parts, and valve bodies benefit from hardcoat’s sliding-wear resistance and heat tolerance (up to the ~80°C thermal crazing limit in sustained service).

Medical

Surgical instruments are sterilized hundreds of times, which would destroy many coatings. Hardcoat survives autoclaving and is biocompatible, making it a fit for medical device manufacturing. Orthopedic instrumentation and surgical tools are common hardcoated parts.

Industrial

Guide rails, bushings, tooling, pneumatic cylinders, and machine parts live on hardcoat’s combination of hardness, corrosion resistance, and dielectric strength.

Electronics and Optics

Heat sinks and enclosures use hardcoat’s electrical insulation plus its non-reflective dark surface. Optical mounts get the low-reflectivity black hardcoat treatment.

Defense and Firearms

Receivers, sights, and wear surfaces use black hardcoat for durability and reduced glare.

Hard Anodizing Cost: What Drives the Price

Let’s talk numbers, because this is where most guides go vague. In the US, hardcoat anodizing runs roughly 2.50−2.50−4.80 per square foot. From a Chinese finishing house like ours, it’s about 1.40−1.40−3.00 per square foot, a transparent 35-45% savings for the same MIL-spec process.

For small to medium batches, expect 20−20−60 per part. Small orders can climb to 8−8−20 per square foot once setup is amortized, and most shops carry a lot minimum around 150−150−400.

Why does Type III cost 2-4x Type II? Four drivers: refrigeration to hold 0-5°C, higher current draw, 3-4 times longer in the tank (45-120 minutes), and the labor of racking and masking. Thickness is the biggest variable. Each thickness step roughly doubles energy and tank time, so a 0.004″ coating costs far more than a 0.001″ coating.

Surcharges add up: sealing runs +0.25−0.25−1.00 per square foot; masking 0.25−0.25−1.00 per square inch or 2−2−8 per part; 7075 alloys +25-40%; MIL-spec documentation +20-50%; and rush orders +50-75%.

Batch size is the biggest cost lever you control. A 0.5 ft² wear part hardcoated in Type III black costs roughly 25−25−45 per part at a quantity of 10, dominated by lot minimums. The same part at 1,000 units drops to 4−4−8 per part. Consolidate your finishing into a single batch and the unit price collapses.

One word of caution on cheap quotes. A hardcoat quote below roughly $1.50 per square foot usually means a thin coating, skipped sealing, or short tank time. You’re not getting a bargain, you’re getting a thin film. Value beats price when the part has to survive in service.

Hard Anodizing Specifications & Standards

If you’re writing a drawing callout, this is your reference section for hardcoat anodizing specifications. The governing spec is MIL-A-8625, often searched as “mil-a-8625 type 3” and now designated MIL-PRF-8625F. It defines Type III hardcoat as Class 1 (undyed) or Class 2 (dyed).

A key detail most people miss: the MIL spec lets the anodizer set the coating thickness unless the drawing specifies a minimum. The default for Type III is 0.002″ (50 µm) ±20%. Always call out a minimum thickness on your drawing or you lose control of the part.

Relevant standards in one place:

  • MIL-PRF-8625F: Governing US military spec for anodic coatings, Type III
  • ISO 10074: Hard anodizing standard with Vickers hardness classes by alloy. The ISO 10074 standard is the international reference
  • AMS 2470: Type III hard anodizing
  • AMS 2469 / AMS 2482 / AMS 2488: PTFE-impregnated and low-friction hardcoat variants
  • MIL-A-63576: PTFE-impregnated hardcoat
  • ASTM B244 / E1004: Coating thickness measurement
  • ASTM B117: Salt spray testing
  • ASTM B580: Anodic coatings on aluminum

A complete drawing callout looks like this: “ANODIZE PER MIL-A-8625 TYPE III, CLASS 2, BLACK, 0.002″ MIN.” If your quality system demands traceability, our ISO-certified facility provides full inspection reports and material traceability with every shipment.

Hard Anodizing Quality & Common Defects

Hard Anodizing Quality & Common Defects
Hard Anodizing Quality & Common Defects

The most common hardcoat defect is burning: dark, rough, powdery areas that come from local current density spikes on sharp edges, high bath temperature, or poor electrical contact. Mitigations include edge radii, controlled current ramps, correct acid concentration, good agitation, and adequate contact area.

Other defects to know: white spots from surface contamination, chipping or flaking on edges (often a masking or handling issue), crazing or fine cracking from thermal cycling (especially after the cold bath warms up), lifting or blistering from poor pretreatment, and powdery films from burning or high temperature. Most hardcoat failures aren’t coating defects at all. They’re tolerance failures: parts machined without accounting for dimensional growth. That’s why the dimensional section above is the most important one in this guide.

Verification matters. Thickness is measured by eddy current (ASTM B244/E1004). Hardness is measured by microhardness per ISO 10074. Wear is validated by Taber abrasion testing, and corrosion by salt spray per ASTM B117.

At Baetro, every part receives dimensional inspection on CMM (Coordinate Measuring Machine) equipment with surface roughness testing, and we include inspection reports with every shipment.

There’s also a thickness-versus-hardness trade-off worth knowing. Beyond roughly 0.002-0.003″, hardcoat becomes more porous and less hard. The densest layer sits nearest the substrate.

Some shops apply 0.002″ and grind off 0.001″ to expose that dense inner layer. For maximum hardness, thicker is not automatically better.

Hard Anodizing vs Other Wear Coatings

Hardcoat isn’t the only wear coating, so here’s the honest comparison.

vs. Hard Chrome

Hard chrome has higher raw hardness, around 1,000 HV, and wins some wear tests. But on aluminum, it requires a zincating pretreatment, it’s a cathodic coating (corrosion risk at cracks), and it can’t be dyed. Hardcoat is integral to the aluminum, needs no pretreatment, and has no bond line to fail. For aluminum parts, hardcoat is usually the more practical choice; for steel parts, hard chrome stays relevant.

vs. Electroless Nickel

Electroless nickel (EN) deposits uniformly on complex geometry, is electrically conductive, and works on non-aluminum substrates. Hardcoat is harder and more wear-resistant on aluminum, but it’s an electrical insulator. Choose EN when you need a conductive, uniform coating on intricate parts; choose hardcoat when wear on aluminum is the priority. Our metal plating services cover the EN side of this comparison.

vs. PVD/CVD and Nitride

These deliver very high hardness on steels and carbides, but they’re not processes for anodize-compatible aluminum finishing. On aluminum, hardcoat is the wear coating that makes sense.

The decision framework: substrate, required conductivity, and wear mode. For aluminum parts that slide or abrade, hardcoat anodizing wins.

FAQ

What is hardcoat anodizing?
Hardcoat anodizing is the hardest, thickest form of anodizing. It grows a dense aluminum oxide layer, 25 to 150 µm, from the surface of the aluminum itself, so it can’t peel or chip. Think of it as a wear-resistant armor layer that’s part of the part, not a coating applied on top.

How hard is hard anodizing?
Hardcoat measures 350-600 HV (about 60-70 HRC) on 6061-T6, which is Mohs 9, one step below diamond. Bare aluminum is Mohs 2.5. ISO 10074 sets minimum hardness by alloy class.

How thick is hard anodizing?
Typically 25-75 µm, with a maximum around 150 µm. The MIL-PRF-8625F default is 0.002″ (50 µm) ±20%. Each alloy has its own practical thickness ceiling.

Does hard anodizing change part dimensions?
Yes. Hardcoat grows roughly 50% inward and 50% outward. A 0.002″ coating adds about 0.001″ per surface, and roughly 0.002″ across a diameter. Machine oversize and specify “dimensions after anodize.”

Can you hard anodize 7075 or 2024 aluminum?
Yes, with caveats. 7075 hard anodizes well but has uneven color and costs 25-40% more. 2024 risks burning because of its copper content and needs specialized programs. 6061 is the easiest alloy to hardcoat.

How much does hard anodizing cost?
About 2.50−2.50−4.80 per square foot in the US and 1.40−1.40−3.00 per square foot from China, or 20−20−60 per part for small to medium batches. It runs 2-4x the cost of Type II anodizing.

Is hard anodizing worth the extra cost?
For parts that slide, rotate, or abrade against other surfaces, yes. For purely cosmetic parts, no. If the part will wear in service, the premium pays for itself many times over.

What color is hard anodized aluminum?
Dark. Hardcoat is limited to black, dark gray, and bronze shades. 6061 takes a near-black finish; 7075 comes out blue-gray and uneven.

Is hard anodizing electrically conductive?
No. Hardcoat is an electrical insulator with a dielectric strength of 600-800 volts per mil, capable of withstanding 1,000-2,000+ volts DC.

Hard anodizing vs hard chrome: which is better for aluminum?
For aluminum parts, hardcoat is usually the better choice: it’s integral to the substrate, needs no zincating pretreatment, and has no bond line to fail. Hard chrome has higher raw hardness but is a cathodic coating with corrosion risk at cracks.

Can hard anodizing be sealed or PTFE-impregnated?
Yes. Sealing improves corrosion resistance but slightly reduces hardness. PTFE impregnation (MIL-A-63576 / AMS 2482) drops the coefficient of friction to 0.05-0.12 for sliding applications.

Conclusion

Hardcoat anodizing is the wear-resistance champion for aluminum, but success depends on three things you now control: alloy selection, dimensional compensation, and honest awareness of its limits. Choose 6061 for the easiest path, plan for the 50/50 growth on every machined feature, and remember hardcoat is not a universal answer, just an excellent one for wear, sliding, and corrosion on aluminum.

When you’re ready to put this to work, upload your CAD file for an instant quote. Our engineers review finish compatibility and dimensional growth with every quote, and we provide free DFM feedback so you catch tolerance and coating issues before they cost you a batch. Hardcoat anodizing at 60-70 HRC isn’t just a spec, it’s a design decision, and we’ll help you make it right.

Need a tolerance review? Send us your drawing