ENGINEERING REFERENCE CHART

CNC Material Machinability Chart

This machinability chart ranks 50+ metals and engineering plastics by how easily they machine — from free-cutting brass at 120% to Waspaloy at 10%. Every rating is relative to the industry baseline: AISI 12L14 free-machining steel at 100%.

50+ Metals & Plastics Rated

Cutting Speed & Tooling Guidance

Cost-Per-Part Translation

Machinability Ratings

Relative to AISI 12L14 (100%)

120% Free-cutting brass
100% AISI 12L14 baseline
50% Stainless steel 304
10% Waspaloy

Cost translation: 22% vs 270%

Machinability · Speed · Tool Life
MATERIAL SCIENCE

What Is a Machinability Rating?

A machinability rating is a percentage that tells you how easily a material cuts compared to a reference standard. The standard is AISI 12L14 free-machining steel, assigned a rating of 100%.

Every other material’s rating is relative to that baseline: 200% means the material machines twice as fast as 12L14 with equivalent tool life. 50% means it runs at half the speed or produces the same amount of tool wear in half the time. The rating is a practical, shop-floor number with direct implications for cycle time, tooling cost, and part price.

Rating Baseline

AISI 12L14 free-machining steel is the industry reference at 100%. It contains lead and sulfur for chip-breaking, producing short chips, low tool wear, and predictable cutting forces — the standard against which all other materials are compared.

Real-World Meaning

A 50% material run at its optimal speed will wear a tool to a defined flank-wear limit in the same number of minutes that 12L14 does. Run it at 12L14’s speed and tool life drops to roughly 25% of baseline — the rating has direct practical consequences.

Cost Impact

Machinability rating translates directly to cycle time and tooling cost. A 50% material takes twice as long to machine or requires twice the tooling cost per part compared to a 100% material. The chart above includes cost translation data for every material.

MACHINING REFERENCE DATA

CNC Material Machinability Chart — 50+ Metals & Plastics Rated

Compare machinability ratings across 50+ engineering materials using reference data derived from production experience and standardized tool-life testing. All ratings relative to AISI 12L14 baseline at 100%.

Machinability ratings are production-proven values based on real CNC machining data. A 50% material takes twice as long to machine or wears tools twice as fast as 12L14. Use these values for cost estimation and process planning.

Material Group Grade / Alloy Machinability Rating Recommended Tool Cutting Speed (SFM)
Aluminum 6061-T6 250% Carbide — 3 flute 600–1200
Aluminum 7075-T6 220% Carbide — 3 flute 500–1000
Brass 360 (free-cutting) 120% Carbide / HSS 400–800
Copper 101 (OFC) 85% Carbide — sharp edge 300–600
Carbon Steel 1018 (hot rolled) 70% Carbide — TiN coated 250–400
Carbon Steel 1045 (medium carbon) 60% Carbide — TiCN coated 200–350
Alloy Steel 4140 (hardened, 34 HRC) 50% Carbide — AlTiN coated 150–250
Alloy Steel 4340 (hardened, 36 HRC) 45% Carbide — AlTiN coated 120–220
Stainless Steel 303 (free-machining) 60% Carbide — TiAlN coated 150–300
Stainless Steel 304 / 316 (annealed) 35% Carbide — TiAlN coated 80–180
Stainless Steel 17-4 PH (H900) 30% Carbide — AlTiN coated 60–150
Tool Steel A2 (hardened, 58 HRC) 25% Carbide — AlTiN coated 50–120
Tool Steel D2 (hardened, 60 HRC) 20% Carbide — AlTiN + ceramic 40–100
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V (annealed) 22% Carbide — AlTiN coated 80–150
Nickel Alloy Inconel 718 (aged) 12% Ceramic / carbide — AlTiN 40–80
Nickel Alloy Waspaloy 10% Ceramic / carbide — AlTiN 30–60
Plastic Acetal (POM) 270% Carbide — polished 400–800
Plastic Nylon (PA6) 230% Carbide — polished 300–700
Plastic PEEK (unfilled) 180% Carbide — polished 250–500
Plastic ABS 200% Carbide — polished 300–600

Tool Life & Cost Translation

A material rated 50% produces tool life exactly half that of 12L14 at its optimal speed. At 12L14 speeds, tool life drops to ~25% of baseline. Use these ratings to estimate tooling cost per part and compare material economics before selecting a grade.

Production-Proven Data

Ratings reflect actual production experience across 30+ CNC machines, not just handbook values. Speeds and tool recommendations are starting points — optimize based on your specific machine rigidity, toolholder, and coolant setup.

MACHINING PHYSICS

Why Machinability Varies: The Physics Behind the Numbers

Every number in this machinability chart has a physical cause. Four interacting properties explain why aluminum cuts like butter while Inconel eats tooling for breakfast.

01

Thermal Conductivity

Aluminum: 167 W/m·K. Titanium: 6.7 W/m·K. Aluminum chips carry ~70% of heat away; titanium only 25% — the rest hits the tool edge at 900–1,100°C. Carbide softens at 800°C.

02

Work Hardening

304 stainless converts austenite into harder martensite during cutting. A half-second dwell hardens the spot. Next pass chips or wears the tool. Solution: constant feed, sharp carbide, flood coolant.

03

Chip Formation

12L14 and C360 produce short, self-breaking chips. 5052 and 316 produce continuous, stringy chips that wrap tools and mar surfaces. Chip character matters as much as the rating.

04

Abrasive Inclusions

Cast irons contain hard carbides. Titanium’s α+β microstructure is abrasive. Inconel has intermetallic phases. These inclusions physically scratch the tool flank, accelerating wear.

Example: Why 304 Stainless Fights Back

304 stainless undergoes strain-induced martensitic transformation — cutting converts austenite into harder martensite at the cut surface. A half-second dwell creates a hardened spot that chips the next cutting edge. The physics explains why stainless needs sharp tools, constant feed, and aggressive coolant.

Thermal 6.7 W/m·K (Ti)
Hardening 304 → Martensite
Solution Coolant + Constant Feed
MATERIAL REFERENCE

Machinability Drivers by Material Group

The dominant physical property that determines cutting behaviour for each common material family. Adjust strategy accordingly.

Material Group Dominant Driver Effect on Cutting Mitigation Strategy
Aluminum Thermal Conductivity High heat removal → fast cutting High speeds, polished carbide, 3-flute
Copper / Brass Chip Formation Short chips (brass) vs gummy (copper) Sharp tools, coolant, avoid dwell
Steel (1018, 1045) Abrasive Inclusions Flank wear from carbide precipitates TiN/TiCN coating, moderate speeds
Alloy Steel (4140, 4340) Hardness High cutting forces, edge chipping AlTiN coating, reduced speeds, rigid setup
Stainless Steel Work Hardening Surface hardens during cut Constant feed, positive rake, flood coolant
Titanium Thermal Conductivity Heat stays in tool zone High-pressure coolant, reduced speed, AlTiN
Nickel Alloys Thermal + Abrasive Extreme heat + hard carbides Ceramic / carbide, low speed, rigid machine
Plastics (POM, PEEK) Thermal Softening Melts if heat builds Sharp tools, high speeds, chip evacuation

Machinability vs. Cost: What Each Rating Tier Costs You

The machinability rating does not just describe how easily a material cuts — it describes how much more machining time and tooling cost a given part will incur compared to a 6061-T6 aluminum baseline.

Machinability Tier Rating Range Example Materials Relative Machining Time* Relative Tooling Cost* Relative Total Machining Cost*
Excellent ≥200% 2011 Al, 6061 Al, C360 Brass 0.5–1.0× 0.5–1.0× 0.5–1.0× (baseline = 6061)
Very Good 100–199% 12L14, 1215, 11L17 1.0–1.5× 1.0–1.5× 1.0–1.5×
Good 65–99% 1018, 1144, 303 SS, 416 SS 1.5–2.5× 1.5–2.0× 2–3×
Moderate 40–64% 1045, 4140, 304 SS, 17-4PH 2.5–4.0× 2.0–3.0× 3–6×
Difficult 20–39% 316 SS, D2, Ti CP, Monel 400 4.0–8.0× 3.0–5.0× 5–10×
Very Difficult <20% Ti-6Al-4V, Inconel, Hastelloy, Waspaloy 8.0–15.0× 5.0–10.0× 10–20×

*Relative to 6061-T6 aluminum: A material in the “Very Difficult” tier can cost 10 to 20 times more to machine than the same part in 6061 aluminum. Use these multipliers for cost estimation, supplier comparisons, and material selection trade-offs.

MACHINABILITY BASELINE

The 12L14 Baseline — What 100% Means

12L14 is a resulfurized and leaded low-carbon steel designed specifically for machinability. Every other material in this machinability chart is compared to it.

The lead (0.15–0.35%) acts as an internal lubricant at the cutting edge, promoting chip breaking and reducing built-up edge. The sulfur (0.26–0.35%) forms manganese sulfide inclusions that shear easily, producing short, discontinuous chips instead of long, stringy ribbons. Together, lead and sulfur make 12L14 the reference for what “easy machining” looks like in steel.

0.15–0.35%

Lead Content

Acts as an internal lubricant at the cutting edge, promoting chip breaking, reducing friction, and minimizing built-up edge formation on the tool rake face.

0.26–0.35%

Sulfur Content

Forms manganese sulfide inclusions that shear easily during cutting, producing short, discontinuous chips that clear the cut zone quickly and reduce tool contact time.

100%

Machinability Rating

The reference standard for steel machinability. Materials rated above 100% cut faster or with longer tool life. Materials rated below 100% require slower speeds, shorter tool life, or both.

Why This Matters for Your Parts

When a material is rated 50% versus 12L14’s 100%, it does not mean the part takes twice as long to machine in all cases — but it does mean the material removes chip volume at roughly half the rate at equivalent tool life. For high-volume production, the difference between 12L14 and a 50% material can be the difference between a part that is profitable and a part that loses money per piece. This is why the machinability rating is the first number a manufacturing engineer checks when evaluating material selection.

100% 12L14 Baseline
Lead + Sulfur Chip-breaking additives
Cost Factor Reference for pricing
MACHINABILITY QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

A machinability rating compares cutting ease to AISI 12L14 free-machining steel at 100%. A 200% material machines twice as fast; a 50% material runs at half speed or wears tools twice as fast. The rating predicts cycle time and tooling cost directly.

C360 brass (120%) is the fastest metal on the chart. 2011-T3 aluminum (310%) is the fastest on the non-ferrous scale. Delrin (acetal/POM) is the easiest plastic — it holds tighter tolerances than most metals but has a low max operating temperature.

304 work-hardens — cutting transforms surface austenite into harder martensite. Low thermal conductivity concentrates heat at the tool tip. Requires sharp positive-rake carbide, rigid setups, flood coolant, and continuous feed. Never dwell.

Aluminum ranges from 200% to 310%. 2011-T3 (310%) is the fastest screw-machine grade. 6061-T6 (270%) is the general-purpose standard. 7075-T6 (240%) is slightly more abrasive. 5052-H32 (200%) is prone to built-up edge. All machine faster than steel.

Lower rating increases cycle time and tooling consumption. 304 stainless (45%) costs 3–6× more than 6061 aluminum (270%). Inconel 718 (18%) costs 10–20× more. Machining time dominates total part cost — material price is often the smaller number.

Delrin (acetal/POM) is the easiest — it produces clean-breaking chips, machines dry, holds ±0.001″ tolerances, and wears tools minimally. Nylon is good but requires sharp tools and dry stock. PEEK is moderately difficult with higher heat and forces.

Waspaloy (≈10%) is among the most difficult. Inconel 718 (18%), Hastelloy C-276 (15%), hardened D2 (27%), and Ti-6Al-4V (22%) follow. All combine low thermal conductivity, high hot strength, work-hardening, and abrasive carbide formers.

From Aluminum to Inconel: We Machine Every Material in This Chart

This machinability chart exists because the material you choose determines everything downstream — cycle time, tooling cost, achievable tolerance, surface finish, and the final price on your quote. Baetro’s CNC programmers apply the data in this chart to every job, selecting the right tooling, coating, speeds, and coolant strategy for the specific material on the setup sheet.